The Crow: City of Angels

Audience Reviews

View More

Justin T @RT08580778 Jan 24 If The Crow (1994) didn’t exist then this would be a perfectly average film, it’s an interesting idea and great style. But as it’s a direct copy of the original with much worse acting this is a well below average film. The acting is so dreadful, all of them are fairly bad but a big shout out to Vincent Perez, Richard Brooks and Iggy Pop for being the worst. The tone and vibe and effects (except the climax) are all there, it’s a great film to look at. It is totally let down by casting and writing. It’s so shallow to literally make the exact same film again. It is the story of the first film again with nothing new, just missing the devil's night backdrop. You probably have to blame the director too. See more TheMovieSearch R @TheMovieSearch Oct 27 The Crow: City of Angels tries to carry the dark, brooding legacy of its predecessor, but despite a few intriguing ideas, it ultimately fails to recapture the haunting magic that made the original so memorable. The first Crow film became iconic—largely due to Brandon Lee’s tragic death and the gothic atmosphere that surrounded it—but this sequel struggles to find its own voice, relying too heavily on the name rather than building something new or emotionally resonant. The direction feels scattered, as if the filmmakers weren’t sure what kind of movie they wanted to make. At times, it leans into surreal, dreamlike visuals that almost work, but the story never quite catches up to the style. The plot meanders from one grim set piece to another without much cohesion, and the pacing makes it hard to stay invested. There are moments where it seems like the film might find its footing—but those moments are fleeting. The screenplay is another weak point. It’s uneven, thin, and often feels like it’s going through the motions rather than telling a fully developed story. The emotional core that made the first film so powerful—a love story rooted in loss and revenge—is mostly missing here, replaced by surface-level tragedy and dialogue that doesn’t dig deep enough to resonate. The result is a movie that feels like a hollow echo of its predecessor, trying to mimic its tone without understanding why it worked. As for the cast, they do what they can with the material, but there’s only so much they can elevate. The performances are serviceable—never outright bad, but never particularly compelling either. The characters lack the depth and charisma needed to make the story feel alive, which makes the film’s emotional moments fall flat. Visually, there are a few striking scenes that show potential. The grungy cityscape and eerie lighting occasionally capture the spirit of The Crow, reminding viewers of what could have been. But those sparks are buried under a muddled story and inconsistent direction. It’s as if the film is constantly fighting itself—trying to be dark and poetic while also aiming for action and spectacle, and never fully succeeding at either. In the end, The Crow: City of Angels stands as a missed opportunity. It’s not completely unwatchable, but it never justifies its existence as a sequel. It lacks the emotional intensity, the atmosphere, and the purpose that made the first film so unforgettable. While it’s a step above some of the later entries in the franchise, it still fails to soar—leaving the once-promising mythology of The Crow grounded in mediocrity. See more Mihai Daniel P @RT71193916 Jul 9 Probably the only Crow sequel worth mentioning as it at least tried to evolve the concept and the mythos. It's by no means without flaws as it's plagued with pacing issues and it's a bit uneven at times but given the right melancholic mood, it's more than a serviceable sequel. See more Fernando R @RT14826977 Apr 10 Só não entendo porque aqui no Rotten tem a foto do filme original de 1994 ao invés desse, mas fora isso o filme é uma perda de tempo, não assistam é tudo muito estranho nesse filme. See more Caitlin A @RT34560494 03/02/2025 Great movie to watch. If you want to watch a father avenge his son’s death with all the symbolism as the first film. Good performances all around See more Raziel T @RT12506642 10/27/2024 Okay; one main thing. The movie's not bad. It's just a whole world worth of different from the first film. It's a fun watch, but definitely doesn't compare to the first installment of the series. That's essentially all there is to say. It's a fun watch, can be made even more fun with friends, and generally speaking it's passable at least and a thrilling watch altogether. See more Read all reviews

The Crow: City of Angels

My Rating

Read More Read Less WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW POST RATING

Most Popular at Home Now